Qohelet in Ecclesiastes
Michael V. Fox in A Time to Tear Down & A Time to Build Up: A Rereading of Ecclesiastes is interesting. I found two parts particularly interesting: 1) His comparison of Qohelet (the teacher - tradtionally Solomon but likely not - featured throughout the book) to parallels in Camus' writing and 2) his conclusion that the repeated refrain translated in NIV as "meaningless" is better rendered "absurd." His commentary on individual passages is a bit limited though. Is very helpful for an overall discussion of the theme/theology of Ecclesiastes.
Tremper Longman III's commentary, The Book of Ecclesiastes, for the NICOT series was particularly useful to me. I found he reasoned well through the issues of authorship, language, and continuity of the book. I particularly found his connection of the prologue/epilogue to the overall theological theme of the book helpful. His commentary is more extensive than Fox's.
My conclusions then (for now):
- The author: not Solomon, but a later author who frames the body of Ecc. as a long quotation from a "Solomonic" character.
- The theological perspective of the teacher: Negative
- The theological perspective of the book: Positive
- The key to understanding - seeing the prologue (1:1-11 - notice the switch from third to first person) and epilogue (12:8-14 - Longman and Fox argue together that the NIV doesn't translate well here) as a framework for the extended quotation from the teacher in the body.
Today many reject God entirely and ultimately come to the same conclusion of the teacher here. Life is meaningless. Absurd. And his perspective would be accurate except for one thing. The teacher fails to properly understand God. He fails to see the ultimate control and goodness of God. Thus he fails to find that there is ultimate meaning in life despite death and lack of personal control. So his wisdom while pragmatically accurate, is ultimately incomplete - much like the wisdom of Job's friends. The epilogue shows us particularly that the teacher demonstrates an attitude that is to be criticized. It points out that human reasoning and wisdom has it's limits. God - in contrast does not.
Thus the book itself is positive in that it takes the teacher's wise but ultimately incomplete wisdom and then points to what we should be doing. We should be living righteous lives because God is there. He is caring and concerned - even about the most minute detail.
Labels: Bible, Ecclesiastes, review, theology

